The legal concept of beneficial ownership is where specific property rights in equity belong to a person even though legal title of the property belongs to another person.
Financial Action Task Force (FATF) an inter-governmental body established in 1989 by more than 35-member countries including India with objective of combating money laundering, terrorist financing and other related threats to the integrity of the international financial system has issued detailed guidelines in connection with beneficial ownership.
As per FATF, beneficial ownership is the natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls a customer and/or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted. It also includes those persons who exercise ultimate effective control over a legal person or arrangement.
Registered Owner Vs Beneficial Owner
Registered Owner is the person whose name is entered in the Register of Member of the Company, as the owner of the shares. The Registered Owner is authorized to attend & vote at a meeting, to receive dividends and to exercise all the rights of a shareholder in the Company.
Beneficial Owner is the true or real owner of the shares which are held in the name of registered owner. The Beneficial Owner is the person, who enjoys all the benefits of being shareholder in a company through another person. It is on the directions of the beneficial owner these registered owner acts.
Like for example in lot of companies peons, drivers etc., in an organization are being appointed as shareholders and directors of the company while the funds are invested and control is exercised by the true owners. These true owners are actually the persons who avail the benefits arising from these shares through illegal payments.
Significant Beneficial Owner under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013
In wake of suggestions of the Companies Law Committee and other developments, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has revamped the existing section 90 of the Act 2013 and introduced altogether a new provision for reporting of significant beneficial ownership in respect of companies registered in India.
As per Section 90 of the Act 2013, every significant beneficial owner is required to disclose the nature of his interest and other particulars within the prescribed period of time to the Company, which in turn will inform the same to the Registrar of Companies. In the said connection, MCA has issued Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 (“SBO”), which deals with identification and reporting in connection with SBO.
possess one or more of the following rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company (i.e. the company in respect of which SBO declaration is required to be filed)—
In simple terms, SBO is an individual who either alone or together with other individuals or trust, exercises rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company by way of holding 10% shares or 10% voting rights or right to receive 10% or more dividend, both indirect and direct holdings or right taken together or such individual exercise significant influence or control, indirectly or along with direct holding in the Reporting Company.
Indirectly Exercise
An individual or group of individuals acting together, can exercise rights or entitlements indirectly, only when they hold such right or entitlement through any other person. The SBO Rules provides the manner to identify the individual(s), who holds rights or entitlements indirectly through the following.
Body Corporate
An individual shall be deemed to be exercising rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company indirectly, where the member of the Reporting Company is a Body Corporate (whether incorporated or registered in India or abroad) and
Please take note that Body Corporate, shall include entities incorporated outside India.
HUF
The Individual Karta shall be deemed to be exercising rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company indirectly, where the member of the Reporting Company is a HUF
Partnership/LLP
An individual shall be deemed to be exercising rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company indirectly, where the member of the Reporting Company is a Partnership (registered) or LLP and
Trust
An individual shall be deemed to be exercising rights or entitlements in the Reporting Company indirectly, where the member of the Reporting Company is a Trust and
It is important note that in case of specific trust, the shares are held in the name of the Trustee. Further the Trustee is duty bound under Section 89 to file a declaration of beneficial ownership in the name of the beneficiaries. So, in case such declaration has been filed, then the beneficiaries will be deemed to be holding rights or entitlements directly and not indirectly.
Pooled Investment Vehicle
And act with common interest or purpose of
pursuant to an agreement or understanding, formal or informal, such individual or individuals, acting through any person or trust shall be deemed to be acting together.
So, for example, rights or entitlements held by individuals, who are relatives or acting with common intent under an understanding shall be aggregated for the purpose of determining an SBO.
In case you are an Individual and holding shares in a company, then following process shall be undertaken to identify whether you are an SBO or not:
Step 1: Identify the Reporting Company for which SBO needs to be ascertained
Step 2: Ascertain you direct holding (if any) in the Reporting Company
Step 3: Ascertain your indirect holding (through body corporate, LLP, Partnership, Trust, HUF, PIV)
Step 4: If there is any indirect holding under step 3, apply the rules provided for identification of indirect holding, where member is body corporate, LLP, Partnership, Trust, HUF, PIV.
Step 5: Aggregate direct holding ascertained in Step 2 and indirect holding as per Step 4.
Step 6: Check whether any relative/any other person with common understanding is also holding shares in the Reporting Company. If yes, ascertain its holding as per Step 2 and Step 4.
Step 7: If any holding is ascertained under Step 6, then aggregate with holding as per Step 5
Step 8: You are an SBO, if individual holding as per Step 5 is 10% or more of Reporting Company. If your holding is less than 10% but when aggregated with holding of other individuals under step 6 is 10% or more, then you along with other individual are SBO of the Reporting Company.
Note: In case of Ultimate Holding Company or any other Body Corporate, which doesn’t have any Ultimate Holding Company, the majority shareholders, shall be either individually or in aggregate of all the individuals, who are acting together. The said shareholding can be held directly or indirectly
Second Step:
Reporting Company shall give notice in Form BEN-4 to the following
and who is not registered as a significant beneficial owner with the company as required under this section but in accordance with SBO Rule
Where no BEN-1 is received as received aforesaid or the Reporting Company is not satisfied with the reasons for non-submission of BEN-1 or where the Reporting Company any believes that an Individual is an SBO, then an application should be filed with the Tribunal within a period of 15 days from the expiry of time given for seeking information in Form BEN-4, for seeking necessary orders in connection with the following:
Note: Identification of SBO based out of step-5 is difficult for a company, therefore
By SBO:
Where any SBO fails to give required disclosure under the SBO Rules then such individual(s) shall be liable for the following
Contravention by SBO of provisions of Section 90 and SBO Rules is compoundable.
By Reporting Company
Where the Reporting Company fails to maintain register of SBO or file return of SBO with ROC or denies inspection, then
Contravention by Company and Officer in Default of provisions of Section 90 and SBO Rules is compoundable.
Note: Where the SBO or the Officer in Default intentionally furnishes any false or incorrect information or suppresses any material information, then they will be liable for fraud under section 447.
So, in case the aforesaid person(s) or entity(ies) holds shares in the Reporting Company, then the Reporting Company is not required to obtain SBO declaration with respect to the shares held by them.
Further exemption to Holding Reporting Company signifies that intermediate subsidiary companies are not require to identify SBO to the extent of shares held by immediate holding company.